Puzzling response

Status
Not open for further replies.

exdc

New Member
#1
In my post at https://logic-users-group.com/forums/threads/paranoid-reflection.758/ I exposed publicly a heartfelt wish, to the effect that Apple change its present corporate policy with regard to the development (or not) of specific hardware and software, to better reflect the polled needs of its loyal user base, of which I am a member, and have been since the LISA and the Apple IIe (>25 years).

Granted this is not a wish regarding a specific function in Logic (for instance: open up the ability of the application to poll our MIDI modules for their patch-name content), yet it is a specific and not irrelevant wish relating to Logic, heir of Creator and Notator with which I cut my MIDI teeth, and I have a hard time seeing why it does not fit in the Wishlist.

Would you who moved it to The Moan Zone please explain, so I understand better how to communicate according to the new rules?

exdc
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Orren Merton

Logic Samurai / Administrator
Staff member
#2
Granted this is not a wish regarding a specific function in Logic
...and that is what this sub-forum is for.

I have a hard time seeing why it does not fit in the Wishlist. Would you who moved it to The Moan Zone please explain, so I understand better how to communicate
Corporate policy rants do not belong in a sub-forum specifically dedicated to requesting new software features. Here is the line:

"I want a new software feature" <- belongs here
"Yeah, it sucks that we can't do that in Logic" <- belongs here
"Yeah, Apple, your policy sucks for not communicating with us" <- errr...no.

Orren
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top